Re: Multiple branches and git-svn

From: Benoit SIGOURE <tsuna@lrde.epita.fr>
Date: Aug 21, 2007, 17:51 UTC
Message-ID: <883671F6-F11C-4962-8BEE-763267DA9FEE@lrde.epita.fr>
In-Reply-To: <20070821151243.GA29020@artemis.corp>

On Aug 21, 2007, at 5:12 PM, Pierre Habouzit wrote:

Show 25 quoted lines

> On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 11:56:11AM +0000, David Watson wrote:
>> Now, I'm not sure this is 100% the fault of git-svn. Perhaps  
>> keeping its
>> metadata about which SVN branch it's connected to isn't the best  
>> thing, but
>> git-merge is doing exactly what you ask for. Perhaps we need a  
>> merge command in
>> git-svn that does the right thing? Although what that right thing  
>> would be, I'm
>> not quite sure.  Either way, there needs to be a BIG GIGANTIC  
>> WARNING in the
>> git-svn manual that if you actually use git for what it claims to  
>> be great at
>> (i.e., merging) you may be in for a world of pain, with your  
>> coworkers and boss
>> coming at you with pitchforks and torches. Especially because  
>> there are
>> so many git users who need to interoperate with SVN.
>
>   IMHO here is what git-svn should do. It should use the not-so-new
> remotes mechanism, and have all the svn remotes branches under a  
> remote
> namespace, clean, simple, and also knowing which "upstream" svn  
> "thing"
> it's following.

Isn't what git-svn already does if you git-svn clone with `-T trunk - b branches -t tags'? At least in my git-svn repositories I do see the SVN branches as remote branches with `git branch -r'

-- 
Benoit Sigoure aka Tsuna
EPITA Research and Development Laboratory