Re: Keeping unreachable objects in a separate pack instead of loose?

> On Sun, June 10, 2012 14:31, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>> I recently noticed that after a git gc, I had a huge number of loose
>> objects that were unreachable.  In fact, about 4.5 megabytes worth of
>> objects.
>
> I got gigabytes once, and a full disk.  See thread
> "git gc == git garbage-create from removed branch", May 3 2012.
>
>> When I packed them, via:
>>
>>    cd .git/objects ; find [0-9a-f][0-9a-f] -type f | git pack-objects pack
>>
>> the resulting pack file was 244k.
>>
>> Which got me thinking.... the whole point of leaving the objects loose
>> is to make it easier to expire them, right?   But given how expensive it
>> is to have loose objects lying around, why not:
>>
>> a)  Have git-pack-objects have an option which writes the unreachable
>>     objects into a separate pack file, instead of kicking them loose?
>
> I think this should be the default.  It's very unintuitive that
> gc can eat up lots of disk space instead of saving space.
>
> Until this is fixed, this behavior needs to be documented -
> along with how to avoid it.