Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] bundle doc: elaborate on rev<->ref restriction
- From
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jul 22, 2021, 11:46 UTC
- Message-ID
- <87v952tvrz.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <27ad38c9-699e-0a9b-1bef-3c5d2950cd02@iee.email>
On Thu, Jul 22 2021, Philip Oakley wrote:
Show 18 quoted lines
> On 21/07/2021 17:57, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.email> writes: >> >>> Should the `list-heads` option be mentioned for investigating existing >>> bundles? >> I think 'list-heads' has been listed in the options section. > > True, it's why I was suggesting pointing at that route for the extra > details that are beyond just a set of refs. > >> I >> however may encourage people to use "git ls-remote one.bndl" over >> "git bundle list-heads one.bndl"---they do the same thing, no? > > It is good to provide both directions to the user. The formats may be > different but the content is essentially the same, and redirecting users > to the more core command is useful. >
I'll work those suggestions into a future update of the docs I have queued, but for now I think talking about list-heads v.s. ls-remote doesn't have much directly to do with this particular series, correct?