Re: CVS -> SVN -> Git
Markus Schiltknecht <markus@bluegap.ch> writes:
Show 6 quoted lines
> Sure, we certainly need a meta format of some sort (not a full blown
> VCS, agreed, but somehow we need to represent commits, tags and
> branches). And IMO, the subversion based format is not a good one,
> because it treats branches and tags very different from most other
> systems (and from what it should be from a users perspective: an
> atomic operation).
Huh? I don't understand what you're saying about atomicity here.