Re: [PATCH 00/11] perf improvements past v1.7.10
- From
Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch>
- Date
- Mar 12, 2012, 16:30 UTC
- Message-ID
- <87sjhd6atl.fsf@thomas.inf.ethz.ch>
- In-Reply-To
- <m3d38hztqt.fsf@localhost.localdomain>
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> writes:
Show 12 quoted lines
> Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> writes: > >> perf/aggregate: optionally include a t-test score > > By the way, have you heard about Dumbbench module on CPAN? It is a > module that attempts to implement reasonably robust benchmarking, > trying to find and discard bad runs (outliers): > > http://search.cpan.org/perldoc?Dumbbench > > It might be an easier solution (thanks to wonders of local::lib) than > GNU R statistical package.
Thanks for that pointer, I'll look into it. I'm less worried about which particular package to use for the t-test (after all it's a pretty well-known method and could also be hacked in directly), but from a quick glance at the TOC they seem to have put a lot of thought into the post-processing.
Show 6 quoted lines
>> perf: implement a test-selection feature >> perf: add a bisection tool > > It looks like those last two (10/11, 11/11) didn't made it to git > mailing list, probably because of anti-spam size limits of email > message on vger.
Oops, my bad. It's not the filter but a 0 too many in my send-email globs. I sent them out, but for your merging convenience it's also at
git://github.com/trast/git.git t/perf-gather-post-1.7.10
--
Thomas Rast
trast@{inf,student}.ethz.ch