git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: Bashing freelancers

From
David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Date
Mar 6, 2015, 22:32 UTC
Message-ID
<87sidhoiy4.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To
<xmqq8uf9ye4e.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
Show 26 quoted lines
> David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
>>
>>> David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> writes:
>>>
>>>> Good work is worth good money. Suggesting that people who are not able
>>>> to work for free are morally inferior is not conducive for a cooperative
>>>> work atmosphere.
>>>
>>> Yes, but I do not think anybody did any such thing.
>>
>> "Of course, I am hoping that all the mentors are doing GSoC not for
>> money but out of love of our software and our community,"
>>
>> Huh.
>
> I did not intend any moral judgement in that statement, but after
> re-reading it, I would say that "not for money" would have been
> better phrased as "not only for money".
>
> Let me clarify.
>
> There _could_ be a mentor who hates Git the software and Git the
> community, who wants to mentor students only for the mentorship
> stipend.

Uh, mentors don't rise from beneath the Earth. They are project members. Do you want to suggest that you suspect those contributors to have worked on Git, which they hate with a vengeance, only so that they could cash in on GSoC? You know the kind of sum we are talking about here, right? Pocketing that makes sense only if you feel _indifferent_ about anything but money and are not planning on investing significant amount of work. It's too little to do something you actually hate.

> I do not want to see such mentors.  I would imagine that such a person
> surely can find something else that is more enjoyable and do the
> mentoring there for money, if competent enough to mentor others.  And
> that would be good for everybody.

I think Google would prefer a mentor who takes the money and does the job to someone who hands the money on to some more generic Git account out of love for the project and community and does not find the time for actually mentoring his student, but feels sort of ok about it because he did not in the end take the money.

Someone who hates Git will at least have a solid idea about where Git is most in need of improvement...

No, I'm not volunteering. I am merely sick of the income-bashing and consider it not doing a useful job for Git or other free software. Particularly not in connection with a program like Google Summer of Code which is _designed_ to let money make a difference.

-- 
David Kastrup
Previous: Junio C HamanoNext: David Kastrup
Message 14 of 24 in “[ANNOUNCE] Git Merge Contributors Summit, April 8th, Paris”
  1. Jeff KingFeb 24, 2015
  2. Junio C HamanoFeb 24, 2015
  3. Stefan BellerFeb 25, 2015
  4. Sebastian SchuberthFeb 25, 2015
  5. Christian CouderMar 5, 2015
  6. Junio C HamanoMar 5, 2015
  7. Michael J GruberMar 6, 2015
  8. Christian CouderMar 6, 2015
  9. Junio C HamanoMar 6, 2015
  10. Bashing freelancers (was: [ANNOUNCE] Git Merge Contributors Summit, April 8th, Paris)David Kastrup, Mar 6, 2015
  11. Junio C HamanoMar 6, 2015
  12. David KastrupMar 6, 2015
  13. Junio C HamanoMar 6, 2015
  14. David KastrupMar 6, 2015
  15. David KastrupMar 7, 2015
  16. Jeff KingMar 6, 2015
  17. Christian CouderMar 6, 2015
  18. Jeff KingMar 6, 2015
  19. Thomas Ferris NicolaisenApr 5, 2015
  20. Christian CouderApr 6, 2015
  21. Stefan BellerApr 6, 2015
  22. Ævar Arnfjörð BjarmasonApr 7, 2015
  23. Stefan BellerApr 7, 2015
  24. Jeff KingApr 7, 2015

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.