Re: Newbie question regarding 3way merge order.
- From
- Raimund Berger <raimund.berger@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jan 31, 2009, 13:26 UTC
- Message-ID
- <87myd7bo8f.fsf@gigli.quasi.internal>
- In-Reply-To
- <slrngo771p.b1i.sitaramc@sitaramc.homelinux.net>
Sitaram Chamarty <sitaramc@gmail.com> writes:
[snip] ...
> Rebase *does* do an implicit merge by default (as far as the > tree that results is concerned, which you mentioned right at > the start), I'm pretty sure of it.
I'm myself, especially since a conflicting rebase leaves the index in an "unmerged" state. Much like a regular merge does. It's still all assumptions though, or maybe I'm missing documentation .... (?)
> Perhaps someone with more git smarts will chip in with > something more concrete.
That'd really be awesome. I mean, it's ok for me to dig through source code and find answers myself, but it would really save time if somebody who knows for sure dropped a word or two.