Re: git tag -v should verify that the tag signer intended the same tag name as the user is verifying

> Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> writes:
>
>> I don't personally have any use case for doing such a tag rename -- you
>> mention two:
>>
>>  a) wanting to call tag "foo" that you found on remote "origin" by the
>>     name of "origin/foo"
>>
>>  b) wanting to call "v2.20.0" by the name "g2.20.0"
>
> For the record, in the latter there is no "wanting to call".  It was
> merely a set-up used to illustrate what support there already exists
> in the current system that helps making users aware of tags that are
> not stored in there "natural" place.
>
> The former however is a natural consequence of noises people make
> around here from time to time, wanting to have tags you grab from
> elsewhere and tags you create locally in separate places.