Re: [PATCH] glossary: improve "branch" definition
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
Show 14 quoted lines
> Sergey Organov <sorganov@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> So, what do we finally do? Just remove "active", or replace it with
>> "separate"?
>> ...
>> It's fine with me either way. Will you just fix it yourself, or should I
>> re-roll if "separate" is not accepted?
>
> Let's see ... gitster goes and looks for what he suggested ...
>
> So, I dunno. I'd say just settling on the simplest "is a line of
> development" would be the easiest path for now.
>
> I've queued the following.
Show 36 quoted lines
>
> Thanks for pinging a stalled thread.
>
> --- >8 ------ >8 ------ >8 ------ >8 ------ >8 ------ >8 ------ >8 ---
> From: Sergey Organov <sorganov@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 23:05:51 +0300
> Subject: [PATCH] glossary: improve "branch" definition
>
> The old phrasing is at least questionable, if not wrong, as there are
> a lot of branches out there that didn't see active development for
> years, yet they are still branches, ready to become active again any
> time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sergey Organov <sorganov@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
> ---
>
> Notes (amlog):
> Message-Id: <87blfnhm8w.fsf@osv.gnss.ru>
>
> Documentation/glossary-content.txt | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/glossary-content.txt b/Documentation/glossary-content.txt
> index 090c888335..67c7a50b96 100644
> --- a/Documentation/glossary-content.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/glossary-content.txt
> @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
> Untyped <<def_object,object>>, e.g. the contents of a file.
>
> [[def_branch]]branch::
> - A "branch" is an active line of development. The most recent
> + A "branch" is a line of development. The most recent
> <<def_commit,commit>> on a branch is referred to as the tip of
> that branch. The tip of the branch is referenced by a branch
> <<def_head,head>>, which moves forward as additional development
Sergey Organov <sorganov@gmail.com>