The meaning of x~0 and x~ as rev-spec.
- From
- Sergei Organov <osv@javad.com>
- Date
- Mar 14, 2008, 13:20 UTC
- Message-ID
- <87bq5ho31d.fsf@osv.gnss.ru>
Hello,
Testing suggests that <name>~0 and <name>~ are the same and are just synonyms for <name> as rev-specs. Is that correct? Is that by design, or by accident?
Shouldn't <name>~0 have [the same] special meaning as <name>^0?
Shouldn't <name>~ be a short-cut for <name>~1, similar to <name>^?
Anyway, I think that at least <name>~0 (useful for scripting) should be explicitly documented, provided that <name>^0 has special (and documented) meaning.
[ The question arose when I wanted to write something like this to automate reverting of a few last revisions:
for i in 0 1 2 3; do
git revert -n HEAD~$i
done
git commit -a
]
-- Sergei.