Re: What's cooking in git.git (May 2013, #04; Wed, 15)
- From
Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch>
- Date
- May 21, 2013, 07:13 UTC
- Message-ID
- <87a9nobyae.fsf@linux-k42r.v.cablecom.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vk3mtwrq9.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
> In addition to your topic, it may be a good idea to notice this at > the Porcelain level (e.g. "checkout -b" and "branch", but not at the > "update-ref" level) and warn or even die if a Porcelain tries to > create a branch with such a name.
But if we're going there and deprecating some ways of naming refs, please also disallow some other funny things in the same go. Michael suggested this earlier in some thread: the fewer ways we have of legally spelling refnames, the more syntax is available for revision syntax.
--
Thomas Rast
trast@{inf,student}.ethz.ch