Re: [PATCH v4] revision: add separate field for "-m" of "diff-index -m"

> Sergey Organov <sorganov@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Add separate 'match_missing' field for diff-index to use and set it when we
>> encounter "-m" option. This field won't then be cleared when another
>> meaning of
>> "-m" is reverted (e.g., by "--no-diff-merges"), nor it will be affected by
>> future option(s) that might drive 'ignore_merges' field.
>>
>> Use this new field from diff-lib:do_oneway_diff() instead of reusing
>> 'ignore_merges' field.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sergey Organov <sorganov@gmail.com>
>> ---
>
> Looks good.  Will queue.  Thanks.