Re: Test that every revision builds before pushing changes?
- From
Daniel Pittman <daniel@rimspace.net>
- Date
- Mar 27, 2009, 01:30 UTC
- Message-ID
- <8763hviwgw.fsf@rimspace.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <49CB4ED8.4060205@op5.se>
Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se> writes:
Show 6 quoted lines
> Daniel Pittman wrote: >> Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se> writes: >>> Daniel Pittman wrote: >>>> I would like to ensure that my commits are fully bisectable before I >>>> commit them to an upstream repository, at least to the limits of an >>>> automatic tool for testing them.
[...]
Show 9 quoted lines
>>> The manual step comes at merge-time; Someone has to be responsible for >>> merging all the topics that are to be included in the release branch >>> and make sure it builds and passes all tests after each merge. >> >> Ah. You have not quite grasped what I was looking for: I was after a >> tool to help automate that step, rather than a workflow around it. > > Oh right. Sorry, I'm stuck in continuous-integration land where people > tend to want the server to take care of such things.
We have that also; I am primarily motivated by avoiding trivial breakage in the CI server, as well as bisection.
>> For example, the responsible person for that testing could use the >> hypothetical (until someone tells me where to find it): >> >> git test public..test make test
[...]
Show 15 quoted lines
> Something like this? > --%<--%<-- > #!/bin/sh > > git stash > revspec="$1" > shift > for rev in $(git rev-list "$revspec"); do > git checkout $rev > "$@" || break > done > --%<--%<-- > > Run it as such: > ./git-test.sh public..test make test
Thank you, that points me in the right direction, and I can obviously season the rest of it to taste — reverse that revision list, for example.
Thank you also to Wincent Colaiuta, who provided a similar script albiet with significantly more detail.
[...]
> It doesn't handle merges very nicely, btw, but I guess this should be > run prior to merging anyways.
Once I have the framework I can quietly work my way through fixing nasty issues one way or another. Thanks.
Regards,
Daniel