Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] commit-graph: segfault & other fixes for broken graphs
- From
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
- Date
- Mar 15, 2019, 10:39 UTC
- Message-ID
- <875zskbevm.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAPig+cTZAhRekr0Yvmtb-gTEATEX19RO0=Zh-ycCPkyEc0OxxA@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Mar 15 2019, Eric Sunshine wrote:
Show 35 quoted lines
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 5:47 PM Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
> <avarab@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I fixed a test to avoid the pattern a0a630192d
>> (t/check-non-portable-shell: detect "FOO=bar shell_func", 2018-07-13)
>> tests for. The new pattern is more obvious.
>>
>> As an aside I don't get how that doesn't work as intended from the
>> commit message of that commit & its series.
>>
>> $ cat /tmp/x.sh
>> sayit() { echo "saying '$SAY'"; };
>> SAY=hi sayit; sayit;
>> $ sh /tmp/x.sh
>> saying 'hi'
>> saying ''
>>
>> I get the same thing on bash, dash, NetBSD ksh, Solaris's shell &
>> AIX's. I.e. it's explicitly not assigning $SAY for the duration of the
>> shell [...]
>
> The shells you tested may all behave "sanely" given that input, but
> not all shells do. For instance, on MacOS, the factory-supplied bash
> 3.2.57 behaves in the "broken" way in 'sh' compatibility mode:
>
> $ cat /tmp/x.sh
> sayit() { echo "saying '$SAY'"; };
> SAY=hi sayit; sayit;
>
> $ /bin/sh /tmp/x.sh
> saying 'hi'
> saying 'hi'
>
> $ /bin/bash /tmp/x.sh
> saying 'hi'
> saying ''Thanks. Also I found (with help from Freenode ##POSIX) that this part of the spec[1] talks about it:
BEGIN QUOTE
Variable assignments shall be performed as follows:
[...] * If the command name is a function that is not a standard utility
implemented as a function, variable assignments shall affect the
current execution environment during the execution of the
function. It is unspecified: - Whether or not the variable assignments persist after the
completion of the function - Whether or not the variables gain the export attribute during
the execution of the function - Whether or not export attributes gained as a result of the
variable assignments persist after the completion of the
function (if variable assignments persist after the completion
of the function)
END QUOTEI.e. this is undefined behavior that just happened to work on the various shells I tested. Makes sense, was just wondering if I'd entirely missed out on what behavior was, turns out it's just fairly rare.
FWIW My bash 5.0.2 on Debian behaves as I noted in both sh and bash mode.
1. http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/V3_chap02.html