Re: Git tedious verbosity
- From
Sergey Organov <sorganov@gmail.com>
- Date
- Feb 13, 2020, 04:30 UTC
- Message-ID
- <8736bf3y8n.fsf@osv.gnss.ru>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqq7e0rvhau.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
Show 18 quoted lines
> Sergey Organov <sorganov@gmail.com> writes: > >> It says: >> >> All advice.* variables default to true, and you can tell Git that you >> do not need help by setting these to false: >> >> If there were an option to set that default to 'false' (advice.default >> maybe?), it'd have answered the demands of the experts, I think. > > Well, just like newbies won't stay to be newbies forever (and that > is why you can disable advice.frotz once you learned about frotz), > what you call "experts" won't stay to be experts, either. A new and > backward incompatible way to work may be introduced and a new advice > message to guide _everybody_ (including those who thought they were > already experts) may have to be introduced, and turning off all > advice.* variables, even the ones that you haven't seen, would hurt > them.
By "experts" here, in the context of particular discussion, I meant Linux/UNIX experts who are used to tools being silent, unless verbosity is explicitly requested (typical --verbose,-v), or at least having a simple way to make them silent (typical --quiet,-q).
>> So...
So in fact this has little to do with git proficiency.
-- Sergey