Re: [PATCH] doc: sparse-checkout: Fix list markers
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- May 30, 2025, 13:38 UTC
- Message-ID
- <871ps6b4n8.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAPig+cQbchWLMH+pTVfLHwFshaex2vhC8Pk57EC4U-vch00ZDA@mail.gmail.com>
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> writes:
Show 7 quoted lines
> You're welcome to submit an additional patch implementing Kristoffer's > suggestion. Normally, it would make sense to send them both as a > two-patch series, however, I'm not so sure that that would be a good > idea in this case. The reason I question it is that the original patch > is an obvious and uncontroversial fix, however, Kristoffer's > suggestion -- because it is a subjective change -- may get pushback > from reviewers.
I had the same thought. If I were working on this topic, I'd send the original as-is with the suggested name fix, let it graduate, and then after all the dust settled, do enumeration-style changes as a new and totally independent patch, which may cover enumerations other than this single instance.
Thanks.