Re: [PATCH RFC 0/5] Patches to avoid reporting conversion changes.
- From
Randal L. Schwartz <merlyn@stonehenge.com>
- Date
- Apr 17, 2010, 22:58 UTC
- Message-ID
- <86zl118z4s.fsf@red.stonehenge.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <g2xfabb9a1e1004171547we6a74176v4a697ded96e9f115@mail.gmail.com>
>>>>> "Sverre" == Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com> writes:
>> We use idiomatic Perl, e.g.
Sverre> Ah, I thought that the discussion was about whether the "$_" syntax Sverre> was idiomatic or not. It got the impression that the "$ARG etc. is a Sverre> failed experiment" was Randal's personal opinion, but if that's how Sverre> the perl community has decided that things should be done than that's Sverre> of course how we should do it :).
Yes. Within the Perl community, $_ is idiomatic.
"use English" is discouraged. It was an interesting experiment, but it failed.
Please stop making me repeat myself.
-- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 <merlyn@stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/> Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.vox.com/ for Smalltalk and Seaside discussion