Re: How should I handle binary file with GIT
- From
Randal L. Schwartz <merlyn@stonehenge.com>
- Date
- Apr 5, 2006, 15:37 UTC
- Message-ID
- <86wte4rq3d.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0604051131010.2550@localhost.localdomain>
>>>>> "Nicolas" == Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> writes:
>> IIRC bsdiff is used by Firefox to distribute binary software updates. >> Xdelta is generic (not optimized for binaries like bsdiff and edelta), but >> supposedly offers worse compression (bigger diffs).
Nicolas> We already have our own delta code for pack storage.
I think the issue is related to being able to cherry-pick and merge when binaries are involved. I've been worried about that myself. How well are binaries supported these days for all the operations we're taking for granted? When is a "diff" expected to be a real "diff" and not just "binary files differ"?
-- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 <merlyn@stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/> Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!