Re: Gitbox
- From
Randal L. Schwartz <merlyn@stonehenge.com>
- Date
- Apr 14, 2011, 02:02 UTC
- Message-ID
- <86vcyhegk6.fsf@red.stonehenge.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <4DA654D4.5040104@medialab.com>
>>>>> "Chris" == Chris Perkins <cperkins@medialab.com> writes:
Chris> Is that a violation of the GPL? I would say that it absolutely Chris> is.
Which part, then? Name chapter and verse.
Maybe the spirit, as you see it. But which letter?
But if the GPL is to be treated as a legally enforceable document, "live by the sword, and die by the sword". GPL-desk-pounders can't have it both ways.
(This is also why it's not "GNU/Linux"... if RMS had wanted that, it should have been written into the license. He forgot, so the rest is history. It's just Linux, dammit.)
-- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 <merlyn@stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/> Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion