Re: Git workflow for beta/production
- From
Randal L. Schwartz <merlyn@stonehenge.com>
- Date
- Mar 14, 2011, 23:10 UTC
- Message-ID
- <868vwh47ss.fsf@red.stonehenge.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <324BE2A8-5987-4324-AE27-D5CC01341710@appnexus.com>
>>>>> "Joseph" == Joseph Huttner <jhuttner@appnexus.com> writes:
Joseph> The catch is that after a feature has been stomped on in Beta, Joseph> it **may** go to Production, but only if Product Managers still Joseph> think it is an important feature. In other words, there is no Joseph> guarantee that a feature in Beta will ever make it to Joseph> Production. It may be axed completely, in which case it would Joseph> never get to Production and would be taken out of Beta. Also, Joseph> there is no guarantee that features that do make it to Joseph> Production will go in in the order that they went in to Beta.
Sounds like you want the same sort of workflow that git itself uses, with topic branches.
-- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 <merlyn@stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/> Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion