git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [PATCH 0/1] v2.19.0-rc1 Performance Regression in 'git merge-base'

From
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Date
Oct 6, 2018, 16:09 UTC
Message-ID
<865zyfys3f.fsf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To
<pull.28.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
"Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:
Show 6 quoted lines
> As I was testing the release candidate, I stumbled across a regression in
> 'git merge-base' as a result of the switch to generation numbers. The commit
> message in [PATCH 1/1] describes the topology involved, but you can test it
> yourself by comparing 'git merge-base v4.8 v4.9' in the Linux kernel. The
> regression does not show up when running merge-base for tags at least v4.9,
> which is why I didn't see it when I was testing earlier.
Strange that it happens; I'll take a look.
Show 11 quoted lines
> The solution is simple, but also will conflict with ds/reachable in next. I
> can send a similar patch that applies the same diff into commit-reach.c.
>
> With the integration of generation numbers into most commit walks coming to
> a close [1], it will be time to re-investigate other options for
> reachability indexes [2]. As I was digging into the issue with this
> regression, I discovered a way we can modify our generation numbers and pair
> them with commit dates to give us a simple-to-compute, immutable
> two-dimensional reachability index that would be immune to this regression.
> I will investigate that more and report back, but it is more important to
> fix this regression now.

I am interested in what you have created, especially because commit creation dates are imperfect indicators because of clock skew etc.

Show 8 quoted lines
>
> Thanks, -Stolee
>
> [1] https://public-inbox.org/git/pull.25.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com/[PATCH
> 0/6] Use generation numbers for --topo-order
>
> [2] https://public-inbox.org/git/86muxcuyod.fsf@gmail.com/[RFC] Other chunks
> for commit-graph, part 2 - reachability indexes
Since then I have found few more possible approaches:
- working with repository metagraph[1], where all chains of commits were
  replaced by edge, perhaps together with DAG Reduction[2] boosting
  framework on this metagraph
- using FELINE-like index (the Graph+Label approch, also known as online
  search), and for those where this index have false results, use Labels
  only approach[3]
[1] Xian Tang et. al., "An Optimized Labeling Scheme for Reachability
    Queries", CMC, vol.55, no.2, pp.267-283, 2018
[2] Marco Biazzini, Martin Monperrus, Benoit Baudry "On Analyzing the
    Topology of Commit Histories in Decentralized Version Control
    Systems", ICSME 2014 (conference paper)
[3] Junfeng Zhou et. al., "Accelerating reachability query processing
    based on DAG reduction", The VLDB Journal (2018) 27: 271

-- Jakub Narębski

Previous: Junio C Hamano
Message 5 of 5 in “v2.19.0-rc1 Performance Regression in 'git merge-base'”
  1. 0/1 v2.19.0-rc1 Performance Regression in 'git merge-base'Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget, Aug 30, 2018
  2. 1/1 commit: don't use generation numbers if not neededDerrick Stolee via GitGitGadget, Aug 30, 2018
  3. Jakub NarebskiOct 6, 2018
  4. Junio C HamanoAug 30, 2018
  5. Jakub NarebskiOct 6, 2018

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.