Re: Status of all files (was: Re: How can I tell if a file is ignored by git?
- From
Randal L. Schwartz <merlyn@stonehenge.com>
- Date
- Apr 9, 2010, 12:11 UTC
- Message-ID
- <864ojkx1un.fsf@red.stonehenge.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20100409113248.GB27353@thyrsus.com>
>>>>> "Eric" == Eric Raymond <esr@thyrsus.com> writes:
Eric> There could be something better. Emacs VC mode, and other similar Eric> front ends, would be greatly aided by a command that lists all files, Eric> each with a status code it can understand. Our canonical list Eric> (omitting two that apply only to locking systems) is:
A lot of these don't make sense for git and other DVCS. How have hg and bzr interpreted these "canonical" states?
For example:
Eric> 'needs-update The file has not been edited by the user, but there is Eric> a more recent version on the current branch stored Eric> in the master file.
This makes sense only with a file-based VCS, not a tree-based VCS like git.
Eric> 'needs-merge The file has been edited by the user, and there is also Eric> a more recent version on the current branch stored in Eric> the master file. This state can only occur if locking Eric> is not used for the file.
Ditto.
Eric> 'removed Scheduled to be deleted from the repository Eric> on next commit.
Not useful in git.
Eric> 'missing The file is not present in the file system, but the VC Eric> system still tracks it.
Not available in git. (If it's not a real file, it can't be tracked. :)
Eric> 'ignored The file showed up in a dir-status listing with a flag Eric> indicating the version-control system is ignoring it,
Eric> 'unregistered The file is not under version control.
These two would be identical in git.
-- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 <merlyn@stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/> Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.vox.com/ for Smalltalk and Seaside discussion