git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: Git User's Survey 2007 partial summary

From
David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Date
Aug 27, 2007, 05:45 UTC
Message-ID
<85tzqla5tn.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
In-Reply-To
<200708270251.05762.jnareb@gmail.com>
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> writes:
Show 15 quoted lines
> This is partail summary of Git User's Survey 2007 after 1 week of 
> running. It is based on "View Text Results" page:
>   http://www.survey.net.nz/members.php?page=results&qn=1304
>
> We have around 445 individual responses, as compared to (I think) 115 
> answers (Base = 115) for previous survey. That is quite a bit.
>
>
> 04. Which programming languages are you proficient with?
>
> It losk like there is only 3/4 people proficient in Perl as compared
> to Python; it looks like Python is more popular. C is most popular,
> with only a few (if everything is all right with the results page)
> people proficient in Tcl/Tk. I'm sorry, git-gui and gitk guys; it
> looks like not many developers...

If the few developers are efficient and responsive due to their choice of programming language, the net result might still work out fine. But it might make the the project more susceptible to discontinuation if existing developers can't sustain their involvement for some reason. On the other hand, code being inscrutable because of not being expressible well in a more common language also carries its dangers.

Show 7 quoted lines
> 26. Which porcelains do you use?
>
> Most people use core-git, some use cogito (the fact that it was
> lately deprecated and is no longer developed notwithstanding), some
> use StGIT, 3 even use pg (despite it is unmaintained). More people
> use StGIT than Guilt, but this can be cause by the fact that Guilt
> (formerly gq) is younger.

I found guilt essentially unusable for me due to its documentation. There is only man-page level documentation for the various commands comprising it, but the overall design is just "this is just like patch sets in ..." uh, Monotone? Don't remember which it was. Anyway, the docs were quite useless to me as someone who did _not_ previously use the system mentioned as reference.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
Previous: Jakub NarebskiNext: Theodore Tso
Message 25 of 28 in “Git User's Survey 2007”
  1. Jakub NarebskiAug 18, 2007
  2. Jakub NarebskiAug 18, 2007
  3. Matthieu MoyAug 19, 2007
  4. Jakub NarebskiAug 25, 2007
  5. Jan EngelhardtAug 19, 2007
  6. Git User's Survey 2007 partial summaryJakub Narebski, Aug 27, 2007
  7. Shawn O. PearceAug 27, 2007
  8. Johannes SchindelinAug 27, 2007
  9. Jakub NarebskiAug 27, 2007
  10. Gábor FarkasAug 27, 2007
  11. David KastrupAug 27, 2007
  12. Gábor FarkasAug 27, 2007
  13. Johannes SchindelinAug 27, 2007
  14. David KastrupAug 27, 2007
  15. Mike HommeyAug 27, 2007
  16. Gábor FarkasAug 27, 2007
  17. Johannes SchindelinAug 27, 2007
  18. Torgil SvenssonAug 27, 2007
  19. Dan ChokolaAug 27, 2007
  20. Johannes SchindelinAug 27, 2007
  21. Benoit SIGOUREAug 27, 2007
  22. Johannes SchindelinAug 27, 2007
  23. Andreas EricssonAug 27, 2007
  24. Jakub NarebskiAug 27, 2007
  25. David KastrupAug 27, 2007
  26. Theodore TsoAug 27, 2007
  27. Benoit SIGOUREAug 27, 2007
  28. Git User's Survey 2007 partial summaryJakub Narebski, Sep 2, 2007

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.