Re: Can I have this, pretty please?
- From
David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
- Date
- Aug 12, 2007, 19:48 UTC
- Message-ID
- <85sl6omt4d.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
- In-Reply-To
- <9e4733910708121228v2fa8d356ld93efa7d1d5effd6@mail.gmail.com>
"Jon Smirl" <jonsmirl@gmail.com> writes:
Show 12 quoted lines
> On 8/12/07, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote: >> IOW, showing the whole history for a big project is simply pretty >> expensive. If you have a hundred thousand commits, just keeping track of >> the tree structure *is* going to take megabytes and megabytes of data. >> Limiting the size of the problem is usually a really good solution, >> especially since most people tend to care about what happened in the last >> few days, not what happened five months ago. > > Could the topological graph for a packfile be computed at pack time > and stored in the packfile so that gitk doesn't have to keep > recomputing it? Does it work to merge multiple precomputed graphs > retrieved from the pack files?
The parent information basically _is_ a bare-bones specification of the topological graph.
-- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum