Re: [PATCH] Makefile: create an install-symlinks target
- From
David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
- Date
- Jul 29, 2007, 22:30 UTC
- Message-ID
- <85bqduvo5r.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vk5sin9g0.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
> I thought we already rejected the "install symlink" in the > earlier round. Am I mistaken, or are there any compelling new > reasons to revisit it?
Uh, perhaps I have a patchy recollection, but what I remember is that Scho argued that one might use something like xstow or a package manager instead, and I replied that
a) this required the installation of additional software for a simple task.
b) if the software worked using symbolic links, it would not know at what level to make the links (namely create /usr/local/share/man/man1 and link every file from /opt/git/share/man/man1, but link the directory /usr/local/share/git-core directly to /opt/git/share/git-core).
I don't remember a conclusive reply to that. Not seeing the patch appear either, I decided to clean it up, remove the objection of using the GNU-specific -mindepth option, and properly document the usage.
Since the stuff is strictly an additional convenience not impacting any of the existing targets, I would not have thought it terribly controversial.
If I have misinterpreted or misremembered part of the discussion, I apologize. No harm was intended.
In any case, some people might want to make use of the polished patch series even if it is not applied to git.git.
Is there a place other than the git list where one can provide patches that are not likely to end up in git.git?
Thanks,
-- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum