Re: Terminology question about remote branches.
- From
David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
- Date
- Aug 4, 2007, 14:11 UTC
- Message-ID
- <854pjfgzit.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
- In-Reply-To
- <8c5c35580708040703w44781498t7396588a3f8c81c8@mail.gmail.com>
"Lars Hjemli" <hjemli@gmail.com> writes:
>> > Was this helpful? > > Talking to myself: obviously not
Disagree. "Does this answer all questions and makes git's behavior perfectly transparent" -- no. But let's not confuse "magical" with "helpful" here.
-- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum