Re: git-cherry-pick problem - directory not touched by commit is marked "added by us"
- From
Hakim Cassimally <hakim.cassimally@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jan 8, 2010, 22:29 UTC
- Message-ID
- <82cfa8031001081429i58496c8y1775deadc11ab4be@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vzl4qegdm.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
(woops, sent just to Junio, resending to list)
Hi,
Thanks for the suggestions, I've tried both those commands, and they break too :-(
2010/1/7 Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>:
Show 9 quoted lines
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes: >> What "cherry-pick" internally does is to run: >> >> git merge-recursive 301a^ -- HEAD 301a >> >> That is, "We are at HEAD; consolidate the change since 301a^ to 301a into >> our state, and leave the result in the index and the work tree". Then it >> commits the result. One thing to try is to see if this gives the same >> kind of breakage.
$ git merge-recursive 301a^ -- HEAD 301a
# woo! no response! promising
$ git status
# On branch cgi_branch
<snip>
# new file: bin/upload_module.pl
#
# Unmerged paths:
# added by us: www/client/css/admin-clean.css
# added by us: www/client/css/admin.css
<snip dozens of spurious "added by us">Show 7 quoted lines
> There actually is another possibility; we used to run inside "cherry-pick" > > git merge-resolve 301a^ -- HEAD 301a > > instead. The request is the same but it uses a different algorithm, so if > one fails and one succeeds, that might give us a better clue to figure out > what is going on.
$ git merge-resolve 301a^ -- HEAD 301a Trying simple merge. Simple merge failed, trying Automatic merge. error: www/client: is a directory - add individual files instead fatal: Unable to process path www/client error: www/css: is a directory - add individual files instead fatal: Unable to process path www/css error: www/images: is a directory - add individual files instead fatal: Unable to process path www/images error: www/js: is a directory - add individual files instead fatal: Unable to process path www/js fatal: merge program failed
At least the latter fails more informatively?
Thanks again for the help and suggestions ;-)
osfameron