Re: git merge --no-commit <branch>; does commit
- From
Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com>
- Date
- Dec 13, 2007, 21:19 UTC
- Message-ID
- <81b0412b0712131319h63609810m593f0e552d02a83c@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.LSU.0.99999.0712132151080.5326@castor.milkiway.cos>
On 13/12/2007, Michael Dressel <MichaelTiloDressel@t-online.de> wrote:
> git merge --no-commit <branch> does "create" a commit. At lesat the > head and index are moved to the new commit fetched from <branch>. Maybe > that is because git was able to do a fast forward?
Yes. Because fast-forward is what it called: fast-forward. It does not do any commits at all.