Re: undoing changes with git-checkout -f
- From
Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jan 10, 2006, 17:32 UTC
- Message-ID
- <81b0412b0601100932v2466151epe44f4c09b18dcc1c@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.63.0601101743180.26542@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
On 1/10/06, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
Show 15 quoted lines
> > > > Can we teach the git:// fetch program to use CONNECT over HTTP > > > > proxies? rsync can do this, but git:// cannot, so firewalls that block > > > > 9418 mean we use rsync:// > > > > > > I think it is good and well with the proxy command support. Everybody can > > > write a little script. > > > > > > Otherwise, where would it end? If you include http_proxy functionality in > > > git, why not also https_proxy functionality? And if that, why not > > > > And, BTW, why not? It may as well stop here. > > Because it's not the purpose of git. It is the purpose of a tunnel. Let's > not make the mistake of Microsoft here: integrate everything until > everything breaks.
Of course, I do not propose to put the code into connect.c! Let it be ip-tunnel.pl, or something like that (which btw is really awkward to handle under a well-known disabled OS).
But, it is not exactly standard tunnel, is it? I mean, can you use it for something else? If not, is there really a point _not_ to put it in the git repository? As tunnel script or program, or as an instruction file on how to setup a firewall?