Re: New version of gitk

From: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com>
Date: May 12, 2005, 23:06 UTC
Message-ID: <81b0412b050512160664965bfd@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <17026.43676.670725.66502@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>

On 5/12/05, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> wrote:

> I have just put a new version of gitk at:
> 
>         http://ozlabs.org/~paulus/gitk-0.9
>

Very, very nice and useful. Thank you!

Btw, how does the tree look like with unconnected (unmerged) branches? And the case where Linus just pointed HEAD to most recent commit?

There are some confusing interconnections in the tree, like around this commit:
"Author: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@shinybook.infradead.org>  2005-05-05 14:59:37
Committer: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@shinybook.infradead.org>  2005-05-05 14:59:37

Merge with master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git" (Maybe show sha1's, just for reference?)

And I got the error below trying to run gitk in kernel git (latest). Probably because I closed window before the script finished something.

Error in startup script: invalid command name ".ctop.clist.canv"
    while executing
"$canv create line $x $linestarty($level) $x $canvy  -width 2 -fill
$colormap($id)"
    (procedure "drawgraph" line 40)
    invoked from within
"drawgraph $start" 
    invoked from within
"if {$start != {}} {
    drawgraph $start
}"
    (file "/home/raa/bin/gitk" line 703)

-- Alex