Re: Bug? git show behaves incorrectly when called on a stash object
- From
Kirill Likhodedov <kirill.likhodedov@gmail.com>
- Date
- Mar 21, 2013, 08:10 UTC
- Message-ID
- <813B5421-0876-40B3-8152-9DCA5D234FD7@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <vpqsj3qoyj2.fsf@grenoble-inp.fr>
On 20.03.2013, at 19:56, Matthieu Moy wrote:
> stash objects are commits with 2 parents (ie. merge commits). One commit > is the HEAD you stashed from, and the other is the saved state of the > index.
...
> Use git show --first-parent --name-status, it should do what you expect
Thanks a lot for clarifying that. It is actually mentioned in git help stash, but I've missed this. With "--first-parent" I get the expected result. Thanks for your help.
> I'm not sure from the doc what the semantics of --name-status is > for merge commits, but it seems it shows only files modified in both > parents.
I think I've found the reason of this behavior. git help show mentiones that:
> It also presents the merge commit in a special > format as produced by git diff-tree --cc.
And git help diff-tree says that --cc implies -c, while -c "lists only files which were modified from all parents".
-- Kirill.