Re: [PATCH 6/17] Document the [<head>...] and -- arguments to git-prune.
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Dec 8, 2005, 23:56 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vzmnb9m7w.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v4q5jb149.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> writes:
Show 12 quoted lines
> Nikolai Weibull <mailing-lists.git@rawuncut.elitemail.org> writes: > >> The documentation for git-prune was lacking descriptions of the head >> arguments and the -- option. >> >> +<head>...:: >> + The heads to look for unreachable objects in. This is >> + relative to $GIT_DIR (e.g., "HEAD", "refs/heads/master"). >> + When unspecified, all heads are updated to match the >> + remote repository. > > ? updated to match???
Come to think of it, why would anybody want to pass heads explicitly? It seems to me that it would allow you to _lose_ objects referenced only from omitted branches...