Re: Strange merge failure (would be overwritten by merge / cannot merge)
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Sep 6, 2009, 21:11 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vzl97ye04.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.LFD.2.01.0909061338350.8946@localhost.localdomain>
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> writes:
> The index case is slightly easier, as we can go back-and-forth in the > source index (we do try to avoid it right now, but that's a small > optimization rather than anything fundamental),...
Almost true, but there is the final "Any left-over entries in the index?" phase in unpack_trees() that relies on o->pos being correct.