Re: [PATCH 2/2] bisect: avoid signed integer overflow

From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Apr 2, 2013, 21:09 UTC
Message-ID: <7vzjxgabd6.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <0cb4456948b0874a1cedc5679a7b23b82e755e94.1364931627.git.john@keeping.me.uk>

John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk> writes:

Show 16 quoted lines

> Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>
> ---
>  bisect.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/bisect.c b/bisect.c
> index bd1b7b5..0d33c6f 100644
> --- a/bisect.c
> +++ b/bisect.c
> @@ -526,7 +526,7 @@ struct commit_list *filter_skipped(struct commit_list *list,
>   * for this application.
>   */
>  static int get_prn(int count) {
> -	count = count * 1103515245 + 12345;
> +	count = ((unsigned) count) * 1103515245 + 12345;
>  	return ((unsigned)(count/65536) % PRN_MODULO);

I wonder

	static int get_prn(unsigned);

or even

	static unsigned get_prn(unsigned);

to lose the existing cast may be a better alternative.