Re: Strange merge conflicts against earlier merge.
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Nov 11, 2005, 22:39 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vy83ukdwf.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20051111215620.GX16061@pasky.or.cz>
Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz> writes:
> 16 anc1/anc2 anc1 anc2 no merge > > What ends up in the index at this moment as "stage 1"? anc1? anc2? > Two stage 1 entries? And what does git-merge-index do about this?
I think we decided there is no single sensible resolution, and we leave stage 1 empty.
Come to think of it, we should signal that we are punting by either exiting non-zero, or stuffing 0{40} SHA1 in stage1, so that we can distinguish the case with two sides adding things differently. Daniel, what do you think?