Re: [PATCH] Allow git-repack to optionally run git-prune-packed.
"Alex Riesen" <raa.lkml@gmail.com> writes:
Show 9 quoted lines
> On 3/9/06, Martin Atukunda <matlads@dsmagic.com> wrote:
>> Your suggestion has merit, though it's different from the behaviour I
>> desired. I _sometimes_ need the pruning, and it felt appropriate to make
>> it an option as opposed to default behaviour.
>>
>> What do you think?
>
> I think that my patch didn't change the default. git-prune-packed is called
> only if -d is given, which is not the default.
I am inclined to say I prefer Alex' one.