Re: [PATCH 2/2] commit: use a priority queue in merge base functions
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Aug 30, 2012, 16:33 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vy5kws5jn.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20120830130327.GB5687@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
Show 6 quoted lines
> The script originally comes from here: > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/33566/focus=33852 > > and the discussion implies that the AUTHOR_DATEs were added to avoid a > race condition with the timestamps. But why would that ever have worked?
I do not see how AUTHOR_DATE would affect anything there, either, other than to give reprodusible object names. The test only sets committer-date upfront, so without setting author-date, you would still get different object names on commits. Which suggests me that there may be something that tiebreaks based on object names?