Re: Regarding: git-lost+found
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Nov 9, 2005, 23:23 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vwtjh8kxu.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0511091759520.25300@iabervon.org>
Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org> writes:
> Why have git-lost+found write to files at all? It seems to me easiest to > have the list go to standard out, and you could do "gitk `git-lost+found > -t commit`" to see lost commits, and reconnect them as desired. (Making up > command line syntax for listing only the commits.)
That is certainly cleaner. The only downside is fsck-objects that lost+found uses tends to be expensive operation, and what you would want to do with the information may be more than just use it on the command line of gitk. But in any case the user could store git-lost+found output in a file to do whatever she wants, so it may not matter.