Re: seperate commits for objects already updated in index?
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Mar 14, 2006, 23:51 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vwtewk2jp.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0603140915290.3618@g5.osdl.org>
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> writes:
Show 8 quoted lines
> I also think that test is historical, from before Junio cleaned up how > "git commit" worked - it _used_ to be that "git commit" would work in the > current index, but these days it generates a new index to commit when you > do "-o", so there's really no _technical_ reason to refuse the partial > commit any more as far as I can see. > > So I don't know. I don't think you were being dumb, I think git could have > been friendlier to you.
I have to go back to the list archive, but if I recall correctly the refusal was added to be friendlier -- by being safer -- and was not there in the earlier round of -o/-i proposal.