Re: using xdl_merge(), was Re: Resolving conflicts
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Dec 6, 2006, 09:48 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vwt5573sy.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vac22glzz.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> writes:
Show 13 quoted lines
> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes: > >> On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote: >> >>> - take every single merge in git (or the kernel, if you want even more) > > The attached is the script I am using. The test checks the > output from 'master' (merge from RCS) and 'next' (with xdl-merge) > and also tries to see how different the conflicts look like. > > In the git.git archive, there is no "clean" merge on which > 'master' and 'next' did not agree. It is not a proof of > correctness at all but it gives a sense of assurance.
And all merges in linux-2.6.git archive either result in conflict with both 'merge' implementations, or cleanly resolves the same way with both 'merge' implementations. I have not compared the conflicted cases yet, but at least it gives me a warm fuzzy feeling to see that autocommitted stuff are sensible.