Re: [RFH] two and half potential fixlets to the in-core index handling
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Aug 23, 2008, 19:21 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vwsi7y1tp.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v1w0fzgpc.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
Show 17 quoted lines
> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> writes: > >> On Sat, 23 Aug 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote: >>> >>> A hacky solution I have in the attached patch is to waste an xmalloc(1) >>> and store it there when o->result is created, and also make >>> read_from_index() pay attention to the cache_nr and the cache_changed >>> bit. I think it is the safest and minimum fix. >> >> Hmm. Wouldn't it be nicer to just add another bit to istate? We have the >> space already, since we already have a bitfield there, with just one bit >> used? > > cache_changed can also become a single-bit field. > > The oldest "the_index" users work from it in the BSS initialized all > zero. We'd also need to mark it as initialized, wouldn't we?
Ah, sorry, even they start with read_cache() to read .git/index (which may not exist yet, which is fine).
Sorry for a stupid thinko.