Re: What I want rebase to do
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Mar 7, 2013, 17:38 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vwqtjm7oj.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <87r4jra942.fsf@pctrast.inf.ethz.ch>
Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> writes:
> I still think that the _right_ solution is first redoing the merge on > its original parents and then seeing how the actual merge differs from > that.
I think that is what was suggested in
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/198316
> Perhaps a new option to git-rebase could trigger the above behavior for > merges, who knows. (It could be called --first-parent.)
Yeah, I think that is what the old thread concluded to be the way to move forward:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/198125
I'll throw it in to the "leftover bits".
http://git-blame.blogspot.com/2013/02/more-leftover-bits.html