Re: [PATCH 3/7] Documentation: complicate example of "man git-command"
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jul 3, 2008, 07:44 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vvdzn2yza.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <200807030806.37771.chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org> writes:
> Anyway if we want to get there, perhaps we should use "git help svn" above > instead of "man git-svn". (Yeah "git help help" might be confusing at > first.)
I do not particularly like advocating "git help" too strongly like that. I prefer to keep the user perception of "git" to be just "one of the programs, nothing special".
If you want to learn about "cat", you say "man cat". If you want to learn about git, you say "man git", and while you *can* say "git help", the point is you do *not* have to. You do not have to run "git" to learn about it.