Re: Bug#553296: gitignore broken completely
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Oct 30, 2009, 19:51 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vvdhwk6dq.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20091030190552.GA3528@coredump.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
Show 13 quoted lines
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 02:41:55PM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > >> > 6. Revert the patch and rework it so that it will only have effect if >> > there is no -i option on the command line. (That is similiar to a >> > mix of 3 and 4.) >> >> Yeah, that would actually be the least invasive change, and would keep >> "-i" just as it is. If we do anything except a simple, I think your (6) >> makes the most sense. >> >> Let me see if I can make a patch. > > Here it is. I think this is the right thing to do. Junio?
I am not sure; my head spins when I see "tracked but ignored" (you have a new one in the test) which is quite a bogus concept.
Does it mean "tracked but would be ignored if it weren't---perhaps it was added by mistake?"?