Re: [PATCH] A new merge algorithm, take 2
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Aug 28, 2005, 09:42 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vslwuo0si.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20050828080341.GA1928@c165.ib.student.liu.se>
Fredrik Kuivinen <freku045@student.liu.se> writes:
> I didn't know you could do things like that with git-ls-files :) But > yeah, it's certainly less intrusive to do it that way. It will > probably simplify things a great deal too. Wouldn't '--unmerged' be > the appropriate flag to use for git-ls-files in this case?
Certainly. I was trying to see if you are paying attention ;-).