Re: [PATCH] branch: do not attempt to track HEAD implicitly
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Dec 17, 2010, 05:55 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vsjxxj640.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <201012151626.35366.trast@student.ethz.ch>
Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> writes:
Show 9 quoted lines
> Martin von Zweigbergk wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> wrote: >> > Silently drop the HEAD candidate in the implicit (i.e. without -t >> > flag) case, so that the branch starts out without an upstream. >> >> Thanks. This has been on my todo list for a while. >> >> Should it only check for HEAD? How about ORIG_HEAD and FETCH_HEAD? >> Simply anything outside of refs/ maybe? Would that make sense?
I was tempted to say "limit to refs/heads/ and refs/remotes/" but perhaps people have custom namespaces defined in refs/ hierarchy and for some of them the tracking may make sense. How about ignoring the implicit track if the ref does not begin with refs/ to cover the obvious ones like HEAD, FETCH_HEAD, etc.?