Re: "fatal: Untracked working tree file 'so-and-so' would be overwritten by merge"
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Oct 9, 2006, 16:55 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vr6xhcttg.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0610090858120.3952@g5.osdl.org>
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> writes:
Show 5 quoted lines
> If the local index doesn't change, we should not print out the "Removing > 'so-and-so'" message, but we should also not even _touch_ that file, > because it was already "gone" as far as the local tree was concerned. > > Agreed?
Yes.