Re: [PATCH 1/4] bash: improve aliased command recognition

From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Feb 24, 2010, 02:56 UTC
Message-ID: <7vr5obpcj7.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <20100224010459.GP4431@neumann>

SZEDER Gábor <szeder@ira.uka.de> writes:

Show 6 quoted lines

> Personally, I prefer the shell function approach.  It needs less 'git
> config' queries; actually, in this respect it is better than current
> master, because there is no 'git config' query at all for the git
> command case.  Furthermore, I don't really like the idea of putting
> completion related stuff into git configuration files, but this is, of
> course, subjective.

Well, at least both of us seem to share the same subjective criteria ;-). The custom shell function approach is the most straightforward.