Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] git-gui blame: use textconv
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jun 14, 2010, 17:29 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vr5k9a5f5.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <c80899f148cbfc9446554c6c706fdbfb@ensimag.fr>
Clément Poulain <clement.poulain@ensimag.imag.fr> writes:
Show 7 quoted lines
> I've seen this series is now on pu. I have 2 questions concerning the > fourth patch (ca23df5e, Clément Poulain, 2010-06-09 19:02:08) tagged with > [DONTMERGE] and annotated with [jc: shouldn't merge this to 'next' or > higher but take it via Shawn]. > > First, is the tag only for this patch, or for the whole series? > Then, do we have something more to do?
That was primarily a note to myself attached to that one commit.
Because I pull all the changes to git-gui from Shawn (and gitk from Paulus) using subtree merge, I do not want to apply patches that touch git-gui/ (or gitk-git/) part myself. Sometime later when the earlier patches in your series prove to be 'next'-worthy, I'll have to nag Shawn to accept it to his tree (we might need to devise a transition strategy so that people who want to use slightly newer git-gui with older git won't get hurt).
Thanks for asking.