Re: [PATCH 0/2] gitweb: Improve handling of configuration files
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- May 25, 2011, 19:34 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vr57m377i.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <4DDD4CC1.3070103@kernel.org>
"J.H." <warthog9@kernel.org> writes:
> I would argue against this, for a couple of reasons: > > 1) Git itself treats /etc/git.conf in this exact manor,... > Case in point turning on things like updateserverinfo, or automatic packing.
If we read both from the beginning of time it would have been more convenient, and I agree with that 100%. So this is not a valid reason to "argue against this".
> 2) Trying to get people to do includes in their config files, or to > completely ignore the system wide config isn't a sustainable practice.
I also agree with this.
In any case, I do not think we have to choose between Jakub's two patches.